Talk:Kang the Conqueror (Earth-6311)

From Marvel Database

It is my belief that Immortus should have his own article; he has an entirely seperate comic book history, 45 years worth of it, that is seperate from Kang. He also has his own set of abilities and personality traits. Immortus is as much a different character from Kang as Iron Lad is, and honestly, has done more noteable things in comic book histor for which he should be recognized. FF6LockeCole

I'd be okay with it, provided there is enough data to fill up a new, separate page. (Which I believe there is)

Anyone disagree? If not... we may proceed.

--Jamie 20:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Immortus actually has very little history, despite first appearing in Avengers #10. In fact, all of his appearances besides Avengers #10 are in Kang storylines, at least that I'm aware of. His next appearance after Avengers #10 is ballpark Avengers #129, during the Celestial Madonna storyline (Kang). His next appearance after that is mid-200s Avengers during the Council of Kangs storyline. There is basically no reason to give Immortus his own page. --Squirrelloid 21:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Kang has noted he was named after an ancestor, Nathaniel Richards. His claiming of Doom as an ancestor was based on Doom's time machine. While it could be a mistake, enough could happen in the centuries for Doom and Reed's descendants to become linked.Kokushishin

I put him as neutral...Kang is usually 'bad', Rama-Tut seems neutral, Immortus is usually 'good' but his methods... KokushishinKokushishin

Can someone explain the whole, Kang/Iron Lad dilemma...It confuses me -- M1shawhan 06:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Move to Nathaniel Richards (Earth-616)?

I vote no. We don't know that Kang's last name is Richards, do we? Plus this would cause confusion with the actual Nathaniel Richards. I vote it stays as Kang the Conqueror (or just Kang) for easy linking. --Edlicious 20:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree with this. Too confusing...Kang's story confuses me WITHOUT changing names as well. --M1shawhan 01:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I only put Nathaniel Richards (Earth-616) up there because 1, that's what the article says, and 2, my own name is Nathan, so it would be sweet if a character this powerful(-ly confusing) had my name.  : ) --Peteparker 02:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I should have known...Nathan's think they can confuse more than the rest of us...NEVER! ;) --M1shawhan 23:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)